ITS OFFICIAL ... LEHIGH HANSON, THE MULTI - BILLION DOLLAR FOREIGN
CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS IN AMERICA, HAS EXPLAINED IN A COURT SUBMITTED SWORN "DECLARATION," SIGNED UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY, HOW THEY DISCRIMINATE AGAINST AMERICAN INJURED WORKERS, AND HOW HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS (DOCTORS) ARE DEFRAUDED AFTER AN EMPLOYEE IS INJURED "SOMETIMES."
WELCOME AND THANK YOU FOR VISITING MY WEBSITE WHICH WAS CREATED TO EXPOSE LEHIGH HANSONS ADMITTED BUSINESS PRACTICE OF FRAUD SINCE 1993. HERE YOU CAN REVIEW THE COURT SUBMITTED INCONTROVERTIBLE EVIDENCE, THAT PROVES HANSONS TWENTY PLUS YEAR FRAUD A FRAUD THAT HAD GONE UNDETECTED SINCE 1993 UNTILL IT WAS DISCOVERED IN HANSONS COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE IN 2010. IF YOU ENJOY READING NON FICTION PROOF THROUGH COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE THEN YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE. ENJOY REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE!
WHO AM i ?
I AM A U.S. VETERAN WHO HAD HIS WORKING CAREER DESTROYED BY LEHIGH HANSONS FRAUDULENT BUSINESS PRACTICE. I WAS FIRED WHILE ON WORK COMP IN NOVEMBER 2006, BUT WAS NEVER NOTIFIED OF MY TERMINATION BY HANSON UNTIL ONE YEAR LATER IN NOVEMBER 2007.
MY STORY IS A STORY OF CORRUPTION, DECEPTION AND OUTRITE FRAUD EXPLAINED IN HANSONS' OWN WORDS IN A COURT SUBMITTED "DECLARATION" SUBMITTED BY HANSONS ATTORNEYS IN A CIVIL ACTION IN SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA.
IN A HANSON SWORN DECLARATION HANSON EXPLAINS THEIR USE OF SECOND JOB DESCRIPTIONS "SOMETIMES" WHICH ARE GIVEN TO DOCTORS TO OPINE ON AFTER A WORKER IS INJURED. WHAT'S UNIQUE ABOUT THESE SECOND JDS' IS THAT THE FACT THAT THEY DRASTICALLY INCREASE THE ESSENTIAL JOB REQUIREMENTS, AND THE EDUCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS AS WELL FOR THE SAME JOB WHICH ARE THEN USED ACCORDING TO HANSON AFTER A WORKER IS INJURED.
WHATS WRONG WITH THAT PICTURE?
IN A CIVIL CASE FILED IN SAN DIEGO THIS IS WHEN HANSONS SECOND JOB DESCRIPTION WAS DISCOVERED FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE 1993 DURING "DISCOVERY." AND ACCORDING TO THE SECOND JD ITSELF HANSON CREATED IT IN 1993 AND USED IT AS EVIDENCE IN MY "WRONGFUL TERMINATION" CASE IN 2009.
HANSONS' SECOND JD WITH ITS INCREASED JOB REQUIREMENTS, IN MY OPINION, PROTECTS HANSONS INVESTORS BY DEFRAUDING DOCTORS TO GARNER A FAVORABLE OPINION ABOUT AN INJURED WORKERS CONDITION. WITH THE INCRESED PHYSICAL JOB REQUIREMENTS FOUND ON HANSONS' SECOND JD'S, THIS ALLOWS A DOCTOR TO OPINE THAT INJURED WORKERS CANNOT RETURN TO THEIR JOBS, AS MY DOCTOR STATED AT HIS DEPOSITION IN 2009 AFTER BEING GIVEN HANSONS BOGUS SECOND JD TO OPINE ON.
THIS NOW EXPLAINED FRAUD ALLOWS HANSON TO JUSTIFY THE TERMINATION OF THEIR INJURED WORKERS BY USING UNSUSPECTING DOCTORS AS THEIR SCAPEGOATS. HOW SLICK!
THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE OF THE KIND OF EVIDENCE YOU'LL FIND HERE ON MY WEBSITE. SO IF YOUR READY I'LL DIRECT YOU BELOW TO THE EVIDENCE / PROOF OF HANSONS' EXPLAINED DISCRIMINATION AND FRAUD.
MY HOME PAGE EXPLAINS SOME OF THE FACTS ABOUT THIS EVIDENCE. ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES... YOU CAN READ THE WRITTEN LETTERS I SENT AND RECEIVED FROM HANSONS' ATTORNEYS AND COMPANY CEO'S ALONG WITH ACTUAL COURT SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS THAT PROVE MY STATEMENTS.
EXPOSING HANSONS' ADMITTED BUSINESS PRACTICE
ACCORDING TO HANSONS COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE, HANSONS FRAUD IS EXPLAINED IN THEIR COURT SUBMITTED "DECLARATION" WHICH WAS SIGNED UNDER "PENALTIES OF PERJURY." AND ACCORDING TO HANSONS' SECOND JD ITSELF.... HANSONS' FRAUD WAS CREATED IN 1993.
SOME HAVE STATED, AFTER READING THIS INCONTROVERTIBLE EVIDENCE, THAT THEY CAN'T BELIEVE HANSON WOULD HAVE EVER TRIED TO EXPLAIN OR FOR THAT MATTER ACTUALLY IDENTIFIED A TWENTY PLUS YEAR FRAUD. BUT THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY DID... AND THAT EXPLANATION IS FOUND IN HANSONS "SMOKING GUN" SWORN SUBMITTED "DECLARATION."
THIS EXPLANATION BY HANSON CAME IN YET ANOTHER CIVIL CASE AGAINST HANSON FOR FRAUD IN 2011. IT WAS AT THIS TIME WHEN HANSONS' ATTORNEYS TOLD THE COURT THAT HANSONS SECOND JD HAD BEEN "PROPERLY AUTHENTICATED" BY HANSON FOR USE IN THOSE RELATED CIVIL CASES. I'LL ADDRESS HANSONS' SUPPOSED "PROPERLY AUTHENTICATED" REPLY SHORTLY.
EXPOSING HANSONS FRAUD WHICH WAS WELL HIDDEN
AS YOU READ THE EVIDENCE KEEP IN MIND THAT HANSON MUST NEVER HAD CONSIDERED THAT THEY COULD BE CAUGHT DEFRAUDING SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES OR MY DOCTOR AT HIS DEPOSITION IN AUGUST 2009. IT WAS I BELIEVE ALL ABOUT THE "WIN." AS IT TURNS OUT IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE SECOND JD WAS USED AT MY DOCTORS DEPOSITION TO OPINE ON. A JOB DESCRIPTION WHICH HAD BEEN REQUESTED MANY TIMES, THREE YEARS EARLIER, IN 2006 AND 2007 FROM HANSONS' REPRESENTATIVES.
AS IT TURNS OUT... THE EVIDENCE DISCOVERED PROVES THAT HANSONS BOGUS SECOND JOB DESCRIPTION WAS GIVEN TO MY DOCTOR THE MORNING OF HIS DEPOSITION IN AUGUST 2009. AFTER BEING QUESTIONED, USING THE BOGUS SECOND JD, IT WAS THEN SUBMITTED INTO EVIDENCE BY HANSONS ATTORNEY ROBYN WOFFORD WHICH THEN MADE IT A COURT RECORD. THE SUBMISSION OF HANSONS' SECOND JD AT MY DOCTORS DEPOSITION WAS AFTER HANSONS SAME ATTORNEY WOFFORD HAD ALREADY PLACED HANSONS' REAL JD, FOR MY JOB, INTO EVIDENCE AT MY DEPOSITION IN NOVEMBER 2008 TEN MONTHS EARLIER. HANSONS SAME ATTORNEY, ROBYN WOFFORD, NEVER ONCE POINTED OUT THE FACT THAT SHE WAS USING TWO HANSONS JOB DESCRIPTIONS FOR MY JOB AT TWO DIFFERENT DEPOSITIONS. SHE JUST LET THIS FACT GO, I BELIEVE, TO OBTAIN THE ANSWER SHE WAS SEEKING FROM MY DOCTOR TO HELP SECURE HER "WIN" FOR HER CLIENT HANSON.
WHAT'S UNIQUE ABOUT HANSONS SECOND JD'S IT THAT IT DRASTICALLY INCREASES SOME CRITICAL JOB REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SAME JOB. AS AN EXAMPLE: THE LIFTING REQUIREMENTS ALONE GO FROM HAVING TO LIFT UP TO 50 POUNDS HANSONS' PRE - INJURY REQUIREMENT, TO NOW HAVING TO LIFT 100 PLUS POUNDS DAILY... POST INJURY. THESE NEW JOB REQUIREMENTS ARE ONLY FOUND ON HANSONS' SECOND JD'S WHICH HANSON ADMITTEDLY USES "SOMETIMES" "AFTER" A WORKER IS INJURED.
HANSON SECOND JD'S ARE GIVEN TO DOCTORS AND WITH THE ADMISSION OF THERE USE... PROVES A BUSINESS MODEL THAT DUPES AND DEFRAUDS UNSUSPECTING DOCTORS AND ALSO DISCRIMINATES AGAINST HANSONS' INJURED WORKERS.
WHATS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?
I HAD BEEN IN LITIGATION FOR OVER EIGHT LONG YEARS TRYING TO EXPOSE THIS FRAUD TO NO AVAIL ...SO FAR. THE STORY OF THESE EVENTS AND THE DESTRUCTION OF MY CAREER IS EXPLAINED HERE PROVEN BY SOME ACTUAL COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE.
HOW HANSON IMPLEMENTED THEIR FRAUD, TO OBTAIN THEIR "WINS" IS A FASCINATING STORY WHICH TO SOME WILL SOUND UNBELIEVEABLE. I'M SURE HANSON NEVER THOUGHT THAT I COULD, OR ANYONE ELSE FOR THAT MATTER, PUT THE PIECES OF THIS TWISTED DECIETEFUL PUZZLE TOGETHER BUT I HAVE.. AND THAT EVIDENCE IS VERY REVEALING AND ALSO VERY DISTURBING. ITS A STORY OF CORRUPTION, COLLUSION AND OUTRIGHT FRAUD BY A FOREIGN CORPORATION WHO IS DOING BUSINESS HERE IN AMERICA.
AFTER EIGHT PLUS YEARS IN LITIGATION IT APPEARS FROM THE EVIDENCE I HAVE UNCOVERED, THAT HANSONS ADMITTED BUSINESS PRACTICE IS BEING DELIBERATELY OVERLOOKED OR IS BEING SUPPORTED POSSIBLY BY OUR OWN JUST-US LEGAL SYSTEM. I SAY THIS BECAUSE OF THE RULINGS I HAVE RECEIVED IN THREE RELATED CIVIL CASES ANY ONE OF WHICH, IF THEY HAD GONE TO TRIAL, WOULD HAVE EXPOSED HANSONS ADMITTED FRAUD.
HANSONS BUSINESS PRACTICE OF SCREWING ITS INJURED WORKERS AND DEFRAUDING DOCTORS HAD GONE UNDETECTED FOR DECADES UNTIL I DISCOVERED THEIR SECOND JD IN MY "DISMISSED" "LOST" WRONGFUL TERMINATION CASE IN 2010. DID THE JUSTICE SYSTEM CARE ABOUT THIS PROOF WHEN IT WAS PRESENTED TO THEM AS EVIDENCE IN TWO ADDITIONAL RELATED CASES? APPARENTLY NOT... DEMONSTRATED BY THEIR RULINGS. AND TO MAKE MATTERS WORSE, THE APPELLATE COURT JUSTICES, AFTER SEEING THIS EVIDENCE, CREATED AN EXCUSE IN THEIR RULING WHICH ALLOWED THEM TO ADJUDICATE THAT CASE. AND DUE TO THIS FACT THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED HERE HAS NOT YET BEEN SEEN OR ADDRESSED BY A JURY OF MY PEERS.
FILING TWO COMPLAINTS AFTER HANSONS' SECOND JDS' DISCOVERY
AFTER I DISCOVERED HANSONS' SECOND JD IN MY WRONGFUL TERMINATION CASE FILES, AND AFTER THAT CASE WAS LOST, I FILED A CIVIL COMPLAINT AGAINST HANSON AND THEIR ATTORNEYS FOR FRAUD. I ALSO FILED A CIVIL COMPLAINT AGAINST MY FORMER FIRST ATTORNEY, HARRY HARRISON, FOR PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE FOR NEVER QUESTIONING OR OBJECTING TO HANSONS USE OF TWO ADDITIONAL JDS' GIVEN TO HIM, FOR MY JOB, IN MY "WRONGFUL TERMINATION" CASE IN 2009. HANSONS ACTUALLY GAVE HIM THREE JD'S DURING THAT CASE. TWO WERE IDENTICAL BUT HAD TWO DIFFERENT HANSON COMPANY NAMES. THE THIRD WAS THE FRAUDULENT ONE REFERRED TO HERE AS HANSONS' SECOND JD.
IN THE HANSON FRAUD CASE, SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE BARTON BLAMED MY HARRISON FOR NOT CATCHING HANSONS' FRAUDULENT SECOND JD TO MAKE IT A TRIABLE ISSUE. HARRISON NEVER ONCE OBJECTED TO HANSONS' USE OF THEIR SECOND JD IN MY CIVIL CASE IN 2009. YET HE HAD RECEIVED IT MONTHS BEFORE HANSONS 1ST MSJ HEARING IN JULY 2009 WHERE MY JOB WAS ADJUDICATED BY JUDGE HOFFMAN.
WHEN ALL THIS WAS GOING ON BETWEEN 2008 AND 2010, I WAS TOTALLY UNAWARE OF THESE FACTS. AND CONTRARY TO POPULAR BELIEF, MY "SKIN IN THE GAME" WAS "ONLY" MY CONTINUED CAREER AND MY FUTURE FULL RETIREMENT BENEFITS... THAT'S ALL!
"DISCOVERY" DURING THE HANSON CASE FOR FRAUD
AFTER MY "WRONGFUL TERMINATION" CASE WAS LOST, AND DURING THE DISCOVERY PHASE IN MY CASE AGAINST HANSON FOR FRAUD, I PRESENTED HANSONS SECOND JOB DESCRIPTION TO HANSONS ATTORNEYS AS EVIDENCE FOR THEM TO OPINE ON. SINCE HANSON HAD USED THEIR SECOND JD TO HELP SECURE A WIN DURING MY "WRONGFUL TERMINATION" CASE, HANSON WAS NOW FORCED TO EXPLAIN ITS USE. THIS IS WHEN HANSON RESPONDED WITH THEIR EXPLANATION OF ITS USE IN THEIR SWORN "DECLARATION" FOUND HERE ON MY WEBSITE.
FYI: HANSONS' ATTORNEYS NEVER USED THEIR CLIENTS SECOND JDS' CORRECT TITLE "CONCRETE MIXER TRUCK DRIVER POSITION DESCRIPTION" ON THEIR PAPERWORK SUBMITTED TO THE COURTS. INSTEAD THEY ONLY REFERENCED IT BY EXHIBIT NUMBER ONLY. QUESTION: IF IT WAS A LEGITIMATE DOCUMENT, WHY NOT USE ITS CORRECT TITLE IN BOLD LETTERS? ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF A DECEPTIVE MOVE.
TO DATE HANSONS FRAUD HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. NO QUESTIONS HAVE EVER BEEN ASKED AS WHY THEY THINK ITS OK TO CREATE ALTERED SECOND JD'S WHICH DEFRAUD DOCTORS AND DISCRIMINATE AGAINST INJURED WORKERS "SOMETIMES" SINCE 1993. NO ONE AT HANSON OR THEIR ATTORNEYS HAVE EVER BEEN HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR HANSONS' NOW "ADMITTED" USE OF SECOND JD'S "SOMETIMES."
BRIEF OUTLINE OF EVENTS
AFTER SEEKING JUSTICE IN THE SAN DIEGO CIVIL COURT SYSTEM TRYING TO EXPOSE THIS FRAUD, HANSONS EXPLAINED FRAUDULENT BUSINESS PRACTICE COULD STILL BE IN EFFECT TODAY SINCE IT HAS NEVER BEEN EXPOSED... YET. AND WHY NOT? THEY WERE GIVEN A PASS BY THE JUSTICES IN THE APPELLATE COURT AFTER THIS EVIDENCE WAS PRESENTED TO THEM AT MY SECOND APPEAL. I HAD ACTUALLY SUBMITTED 1070 PAGES OF EVIDENCE THAT OUTLINES HANSONS BUSINESS PRACTICE IN DETAIL.
HOWEVER THIS EVIDENCE WAS DISREGARDED BY THE JUSTICES AND THEIR FINAL RULING RESULTED IN THE DISMISSAL OF MY CIVIL RELATED CASE. THIS APPEAL PROCESS TOOK ALMOST THREE YEARS FOR THE JUSTICES TO RENDER THEIR FINAL DECISION.
HOW COULD THIS OF HAPPENED YOU ASK? WELL IN MY OPINION AFTER THOSE THREE APPELLATE COURT JUSTICES SAW MY 1070 PAGES OF DAMMING EVIDENCE, I BELIEVE THEY HAD A REVELATION. I BELIEVE THEY REALIZED THAT IF THEY WERE TO LET ME AND THIS EVIDENCE INTO A TRIAL, IT WOULD NOT ONLY HAVE EXPOSED HANSONS' TWENTY PLUS YEAR FRAUD, BUT IT WOULD HAVE ALSO EXPOSED THEIR FELLOW BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF THE BAR INVOLVEMENT IN THE COVER-UP IN THOSE RELATED CASES. I ALSO BELIEVE THIS TO BE TRUE BECAUSE THIS EVIDENCE, FROM THOSE THREE RELATED CIVIL CASES, PAINTS A VERY DISTURBING PICTURE THAT THE "FIX" WAS IN.
IN ORDER FOR THE JUSTICES TO KEEP THIS EVIDENCE OUT OF COURT, THEY CREATED I BELIEVE AN "EXCUSE." I SAY THIS BECAUSE THERE IS NO WRITTEN HARD EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THEIR RULING AND THEREFORE IT'S JUST THEIR OPINION. THEIR "EXCUSE" HOWEVER ALLOWED MY CIVIL CASE TO BE THROWN OUT ADJUDICATED! MY EVIDENCE / PROOF THEREFORE WAS BLOCKED FROM BEING SEEN BY A JURY OF MY PEERS WHO WILL DECIDE SOMEDAY IF HANSON CAN USE MULTIPLE JDS' BEFORE AND AFTER A WORKER IS INJURED. SO MY FIGHT 4 JUSTICE CONTINUES NOW INTO 2017.
THE DISCOVERY OF LEHIGH HANSONS TWENTY PLUS YEAR FRAUD WAS SHARED WITH BOTH HEIDELBERG AND HANSONS' CEO'S IN 2012. HOWEVER AFTER SENDING THIS EVIDENCE TO THEM CERTIFIED MAIL... THEY BOTH CHOSE TO REFUSE TO ADDRESS THESE FACTS PERSONALLY. INSTEAD THEY HAD THEIR ATTORNEY, CLAUDETTE WILSON, RESPOND ON THEIR BEHALF. THE LETTERS WRITTEN TO BOTH CEO'S IN 2012 AND MS. WILSON'S RESPONSE LETTER CAN ALL BE READ HERE. HANSON CAN RUN... BUT THEY CANNOT HIDE FROM THEIR COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE / PROOF OF A TWENTY PLUS YEAR FRAUD SINCE 1993.
THIS EVIDENCE WILL EVENTUALLY BE EXPOSED THAT IM SURE. I JUST DON'T KNOW WHEN. ITS SITUATIONS LIKE THESE THAT CREATES GROWING OUTCRIES THAT OUR JUST-US SYSTEM IS CORRUPT AND NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED AND EXPOSED IN ORDER TO PROTECT ALL AMERICAN WORKERS IN THE FUTURE, INJURED OR NOT.
I HAVE THE ERIN BROCKOVICH INCONTROVERTIBLE "SMOKING GUN" TYPE EVIDENCE AND ALL I NEED IS SOMEONE WITH "TEETH" TO INVESTIGATE HANSONS' EXPLAINED FRAUD. MAYBE OUR NEW PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, WHO LOVES US VETERANS AND WHO DISLIKES VETERANS BEING SCREWED... ESPECIALLY BY A FOREIGN CORPORATION LIKE HANSON MAY BECOME THE "TEETH" NEEDED. HMMM !!!!!!
NO CORPORATION NO MATTER HOW POWERFUL, FOREIGN OR DOMESTIC SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO DODGE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR BREAKING THE LAW. THE COURTS NEED TO DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY OF HANSONS' EXPLAINED FRAUD AGAINST DOCTORS AND INJURED AMERICAN WORKERS.
AN INTERESTING FACT:
I READ AN ARTICLE FROM SAN DIEGO WHERE ONE OF THE HANSON ATTORNEYS, FROM MY CIVIL CASE, WAS INTERVIEWED. AND AS THE ARTICLE POINTS OUT, THIS PARTICULAR ATTORNEY BEFORE ACTUALLY BECOMING AN ATTORNEY, QUIT A JOB AT A LAW FIRM IN THE 70'S WHEN SHE WAS ASKED TO BACK-DATE DOCUMENTS USED IN COMPLAINTS.
NOW DECADES LATER, AS AN ATTORNEY, THE VALUES SHE ONCE ARTICULATED IN HER INTERVIEW APPARENTLY ARE NOW GONE. SHE NEEDED TO PROTECT HER BIG CLIENT HANSON SO SHE BACKDATED A BILLING STATEMENT THAT COINCIDED WITH HER CO-COUNSELS BILLING DATE FOR, GET THIS, THEIR REVIEW AND SUBMISSION OF HANSONS "SMOKING GUN" "DECLARATION" INTO EVIDENCE. YES ITS THE SAME "DECLARATION" THAT EXPLAINS HANSONS ADMITTED USE OF SECOND JDS' "SOMETIMES." WOAH !!!!
THIS STORY MAY SEEM UNBELIEVABLE TO MANY BECAUSE "DECEPTION" IS A DESPICABLE TOOL THAT'S USED BY MANY. HOWEVER THESE ARE THE FACTS... SUPPORTED BY HANSONS OWN "COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE." HANSONS ATTORNEYS APPARENTLY SEES NO PROBLEM WITH THEIR CLIENTS USE OF SECOND JD'S "SOMETIMES." WHAT THE HECK... IF IT HELPS TO SECURE A "WIN".. WHY NOT USE THEM ESPECIALLY IF YOU THINK YOU'LL NEVER BE CAUGHT.... WRONG AGAIN!
SINCE HANSONS' SMOKING GUN "DECLARATION" WAS PLACED INTO EVIDENCE BY HANSONS OWN ATTORNEYS, I BELIEVE THAT I SHOULD BE THANKING THEM FOR EXPOSING THEIR CLIENTS ADMITTED USE OF SECOND JDS' WHICH EXPLAIN A FRAUDULENT BUSINESS PRACTICE SINCE 1993.
LEHIGH HANSON OPERATES WORLDWIDE INCLUDING AMERICA. WHEN HANSON WAS CALLED OUT ABOUT THEIR USE OF SECOND JDS', THIS IS WHEN THEY EXPLAINED THAT THERE ONLY USED "SOMETIMES"... AS THOUGH THAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE! LEHIGH HANSON, FORMALLY KNOWN AS HANSON AGGREGATES PACIFIC SOUTHWEST INC. (PSW) WAS PURCHASED BY THE HEIDELBERG_CEMENT GROUP FOR 15.8 BILLION DOLLARS IN 2007. HENCE HANSON AGGREGATES PSW IS NOW KNOWN TODAY AS LEHIGH HANSON.
HISTORY ABOUT THIS INCONTROVERTIBLE EVIDENCE
HANSONS ADMITTED FRAUD IS VERY DISTURBING TO SAY THE LEAST. HANSON EXPLAINED, FOR WHAT ITS WORTH, THAT THEIR SECOND JOB DESCRIPTIONS (JD) ARE ONLY USED "SOMETIMES" AFTER A WORKER IS INJURED. "SOMETIMES" ???. WHAT EXACTLY ARE THE QUALIFICATIONS FOR HANSONS' USE THESE SECOND JD'S ? IS IT WHEN YOUR AN INJURED BLACK, HISPANIC, FEMALE, OR MAYBE YOUR JUST NOT LIKED OR ARE JUST TO OLD... IS THIS WHEN HANSON WHIPS OUT THEIR SPECIAL SECOND JOB DESCRIPTIONS TO GIVE DOCTORS TO OPINE ON? SECOND JDS" THAT MAY INFLUENCE DOCTORS TO OPINE THAT INJURED WORKERS CANNOT RETURN TO WORK AFTER AN INJURY? THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED TO ME WHEN MY DOCTOR WAS DEFRAUDED AT HIS DEPOSITION IN MY CASE.
HERE'S ANOTHER FACT.... HANSONS' SECOND JD DRASTICALLY INCREASES THE EDUCATIONAL AND PHYSICAL JOB REQUIREMENTS, FOR THE SAME JOB, AND IS THEN GIVEN TO DOCTORS "SOMETIMES" "AFTER" A WORKER IS INJURED. IF YOU FIND THIS UNBELIEVABLE THEN READ HANSONS "DECLARATION" FOR YOURSELF ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES.
WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?
IN THREE RELATED CIVIL CASES, HANSON'S ATTORNEYS TOLD THE COURTS THAT HANSONS' SECOND JD HAD BEEN PROPERLY AUTHENTICATED FOR USE BY HANSON. THE BURNING QUESTING NOW BECOMES... HOW CAN ANY CORPORATION "PROPERLY AUTHENTICATE" A FRAUD WHICH, AS IN THIS CASE, HAS BEEN ONGOING, ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN SECOND JD, SINCE 1993... OVER TWENTY PLUS YEARS AN ADMITTED FRAUD BY HANSON? HOW DOES THAT WORK, ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE WAS A UNION CONTRACT THAT IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL LAWS?
"A TWENTY PLUS YEAR FRAUD"
DO YOU FIND IT UNBELIEVABLE THAT HANSON HAS EXPLAINED A TWENTY PLUS YEAR DISCRIMINATION / FRAUDULENT BUSINESS PRACTICE IN A "DECLARATION" ? MAYBE THEY THOUGHT NO ONE WOULD BE PAYING ATTENTION. A FRAUDULENT BUSINESS PRACTICE AIMED SQUARELY AT HANSONS' INJURED WORKERS AND AMERICAN DOCTORS. UNBELIEVABLE!
I BELIEVE THAT WHEN THESE FACTS ARE EXPOSED, HANSON WILL BE FORCED TO EXPLAIN THEIR FRAUD. IM LOOKING FORWARD TO SEE HOW MANY HANSON ATTORNEYS WILL TRY TO DEFEND THE INDEFENSIBLE.
I ALSO BELIEVE THAT WHEN THIS EVIDENCE IS INVESTIGATED, HANSONS' ATTORNEYS WILL TRY TO "SOUNDBITE" AND "SPIN" THEIR WAY OUT OF THEIR CREATED MESS. I ALSO BELIEVE THAT ONE GAME PLAN MAY INCLUDE TRYING TO MAKE THIS DAMMING EVIDENCE SOMEHOW DISAPPEAR. HOWEVER, ITS TOO LATE TO HIDE THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM AND TO MANY PEOPLE HAVE NOW REVIEWED THIS EVIDENCE.
I BELIEVE WHEN THIS PROOF IS INVESTIGATED HANSON WILL TRY TO CLAIM THAT I AM JUST A DISGRUNTLED FORMER EMPLOYEE OUT TO SMEAR HANSON'S NAME. FOR THE RECORD.... I HAVE GIVEN HANSON AMPLE OPPORTUNITIES TO ADDRESS THIS EVIDENCE TO NO AVAIL. THEIR STANDARD RESPONSE IS "THE COURTS HAVE SPOKEN." WELL DUH.. AFTER THE COURTS WERE DEFRAUDED BY THE USE OF SECOND JDS' TO GET THE DISMISSAL OF MY CASE WHICH THEY WERE SEEKING. HOW PATHETIC!
I AM NOT, FOR THOSE WONDERING, A FORMER DISGRUNTLED EMPLOYEE AT HANSON. THIS IS PROVEN BY THE "SERVICE AWARD" I WAS GIVEN FOR MY LOYALTY OF SERVICE TO HANSON. THIS AWARD WAS PRESENTED BEFORE MY INJURY AND BEFORE HANSON SECRETLY DUMPED ME LIKE A PIECE OF TRASH IN 2006.
I HAVE BEEN WAITING EIGHT PLUS YEARS TO PRESENT THIS EVIDENCE IN A COURT OF LAW TO SHOW WHAT HANSON DELIBERATELY DID TO ME AND MY FAMILY. THE COURT JUSTICES IN SAN DIEGO HAVE BLOCKED ACCESS TO A FAIR TRIAL.
I HAVE NOT EXPOSED THESE FACTS PUBLICLY YET BECAUSE JON MORRISH, HANSONS NEW CEO, PROBABLY WAS UNAWARE OF THIS EVIDENCE SO I RECENTLY REACHED OUT TO HIM AS A COURTESY. FOR MY EFFORTS I WAS RESPONDED TO WITH THE STANDARD "THE COURTS HAVE SPOKEN" MIDDLE FINGER RESPONSE. I HELD OFF EXPOSING THESE FACTS THINKING SOMEONE AT HANSON HAD ADULT QUALITIES BUT I WAS WRONG. I WANTED TO GIVE HANSON ONE FINAL CHANCE TO MAKE GOOD ON THEIR EMPLOYEES ADMITTED FRAUD BUT NOW ALL EFFORTS WITH THEIR RESPONSE HAVE EXPIRED.
I HAVE NO INTENTION OF BACKING DOWN UNTIL THIS FRAUD IS NOW EXPOSED AND HANSONS EMPLOYEES ARE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF MY CAREER AND RETIREMENT. I HAD THOUGHT THAT HANSONS NEW CEO, JON MORRISH, WOULD WANT TO CORRECT THIS TERRIBLE WRONG. SO I EMAILED THESE FACTS TO HIS NEW SECRETARY, JULIE RODRIGUEZ WHO I HAD SPOKEN WITH. SHE ASSURED ME THAT MY CORRESPONDENCE WOULD BE DELIVERED TO MR MORRISH. HOWEVER I WAS LIED TO ONCE AGAIN ADDRESSED BELOW.
I JUST RECEIVED AN EMAIL RESPONSE FROM MS RODRIGUEZ WHO STATED THAT I AM NOT TO CONTACT HER EVER AGAIN AND THAT "THE COURTS HAVE SPOKEN." APPARENTLY SHE IS LISTENING TO HANSONS LEGAL CRONIES AND IS NOT PERSONALLY AWARE OF THIS EVIDENCE AND FACTS. THEREFORE MY LAST EARNEST ATTEMPT, AS A COURTESY TO JON MORRISH, HAS BEEN RESPONDED TO BY HANSONS MIDDLE FINGER RESPONSE. THAT'S IT.... IM DONE!
MR. MORRISH HAS DECIDED TO IGNORE THIS EVIDENCE, LIKE HIS PREDECESSOR DAN HARRINGTON DID IN 2012. HOW SAD! I AM NOW FORCED INTO THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL ARENA AND INTO THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION TO EXPOSE HANSONS UNEXPLAINED AND UNADDRESSED ADMITTED FRAUD.
WHEN THESE FACTS ARE EXPOSED IT SHOULD FLUSH OUT THE MANY PLAYERS WHO HAVE COVERED UP THIS EVIDENCE. EVIDENCE THAT EXPLAINS HANSONS' ADMITTED BUSINESS PRACTICES THAT ALLOWS THE TERMINATION OF HANSONS' INJURED WORKERS "SOMETIMES" BY USING DOCTORS TO DO THEIR DIRTY WORK. WHAT A SCAM BUT ONE THAT HAS BEEN UNCOVERED.
ONE THING IS CERTAIN, WHEN THIS EVIDENCE IS FINALLY EXPOSED WE WILL FIND OUT HOW MANY OTHER INJURED WORKERS WERE TERMINATED OVER THE YEARS SINCE 1993 BY THE ADMITTED USE OF HANSONS SPECIAL SECOND JD'S. HANSONS' "SMOKING GUN" "DECLARATION" EXPLAINS HANSONS' FRAUD AND SETS A PRESIDENT WHICH WILL BE IMPOSSIBLE TO DEFEND BECAUSE ITS HANSONS' ADMITTED AND COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE.
AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED... HOW DARE THEY THINK THAT THEY CAN DESTROY A U.S. VETERANS WORKING CAREER AND HIS FAMILY JUST BECAUSE THEY HAVE A FEW EXTRA BUCKS IN THE BANK. ITS ALL ABOUT ACCOUNTABILITY!!!!!!
AND THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF MY CAREER WILL SOON BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN WHY THEY THINK IT'S OK TO USE SECOND JD'S "SOMETIMES" AND WHY THEY BELIEVE ITS LEGAL TO INCREASE THE JOB REQUIREMENTS AFTER A WORKER IS INJURED AND THEN GIVE THOSE BOGUS JDS' TO DOCTORS TO OPINE ON. A GREAT PLAN IF YOUR NEVER CAUGHT!
JON MORRISH HAS MADE HIS DECISION. THEREFORE HANSON CAN EXPLAIN THEIR FRAUD NOW IN A CRIMINAL COURT OF LAW.
IN MY EXPERIENCES THROUGHOUT THESE THREE RELATED CIVIL CASES I HAVE LEARNED THAT
"In America...is NOT for all Americans"
When a criminal investigation is launched, my 1070 pages of evidence will be submitted once again for review. It will expose Hanson's explanation of their use of Second Jds' 'Sometimes" since 1993 again!
Many suggest that those responsible for blocking my access to a civil court trial should be investigated also to identify the players involved in this massive cover-up. Unless there is written hard evidence that proves that the Appellate Court justices were defrauded by Attorney Noons' defense team... those justices may also become part of that investigation. It's a fact that they were given 1070 pages of damming evidence, but chose to dismiss my civil case none the less.
One justice even pointed out to the defense attorney Timothy Noon, at my First Appeal oral argument hearing, that there are "two quite different Hanson job descriptions here Mr. Noon." This is and always has been the Triable Issue as to whether or not Hanson is legally allowed to use two vastly different JDs'... one before a person is hired and a second one after a person is injured. We shall see!
Even though the justices acknowledged Hansons' use of two different JDS' it didn't change the outcome of the case. They identified the triable issue which should have gone to a jury for deliberation. However that didn't happen! Instead they created an "excuse" and dismissed my case that blocked me from a jury trial.
FYI: In order for those Justices to have thrown out my case for the reasons they cited, the only logical conclusion is that they must have been given Written Hard Evidence by the defense team that was not shared with me to respond to as a pro per litigant. Hard evidence that proves my first attorney, Harrison, had engaged in what the justices stated was a "New Litigation Strategy" before he walked out on my Wrongful Termination case in 2010. The justices said that I needed an Expert Witness (another attorney) to explain Harrisons' "New Litigation Strategy" to judge Taylor. And since an expert was not provided to explain Harrisons' supposed New Litigation Strategy, which I was never informed of and knew nothing about ... I lose?
FYI: First off, if I had known that Harrison had a "New Litigation Strategy" doesn't it stand to reason that I would have provided an expert witness especially after being involved in litigation for numerous years to expose Hansons' fraud? But how can someone produce an expert witness to explain a "New Litigation Strategy" when that strategy was NEVER shared with me by Harrison ever? HELLO DUH !!!!
Evil Prevails when good men and women stand by and do NOTHING!
"Caution Your About To Enter The No Spin Zone" If the evidence here is not studied carefully, my statements could easily be taken out of context and/or sound unbelievable. Therefore please do not "Sound Bite" or "Skim" through these files on the following pages. How could any intelligent person have missed the obvious differences between Hanson's two submitted JD's and not question their differences or their legality? But thats exactly what happened. The elephant somehow made it through the room undetected... How Sad.
Judges understandably have tremendous work loads and therefore rely heavily on the "Honesty" of their Brothers and Sisters of the bar and court readers to not mislead them into error. The submitted evidence here proves that some attorney's lied and did so frequently to these same judges. For Example; Some attorneys states that both JDS' are the same in "RELATIVE ASPECTS" and that Hansons' SECOND JDS" are just more DETAILED.
This is an OBVIOUS bald face LIE as you will see when you review both JDS' in question for yourself. Are those lies being overlooked to protect the attorneys and Hansons' admitted use of SECOND JD's ? Time will tell! There is a lot of finger pointing going on here between the attorneys, judges and now the justices. Therefore its time to get this evidence out in the open.
In Closing: If you choose to read the evidence you will discover other interesting facts as well. Such as the written correspondences sent to both CEO's at HeidelbergCement Group and Lehigh Hanson. And the letter sent to the VP of of Hansons' HR department to give them all a heads up of my discovery of Hansons' SECOND JD in my lost case files.
In my opinion Hanson use of their never before seen SECOND JD's is a Fraud pure and simple. JD's that change some of the Working Conditions / Essential Functions for the same job 100% and then are admittedly used "Sometimes" "AFTER" a worker is injured.
What I have experienced in my three civil cases by those entrusted to protect my Constitutional Rights to a jury trial over the past EIGHT YEARS is illustrated in the
picture below ...
One Closing Thought
The Seventh Amendment (Amendment VII) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. This amendment codifies the right to a jury trial in certain civil cases, and inhibits courts from overturning a jury's findings of fact.
I believe that the game played by the Just - Us crowd as I have learned, is to keep the plaintiff out of court so you don't have to worry about a jury's findings.
MyFight 4 Justice has been an uphill battle to expose the truth for years. If you understand what are about to read here then Im asking for your help to get the word out about these Facts and Evidence to others.
Please share my website www.myfight4justice.com with your friends and family on Facebook, Twitter and any other social media outlets that will alert Investigative Reporters and the Press to this court submitted evidence.
The proof will be exposed someday and when it does it will protect many other American families from this ADMITTED Discrimination, Abuse and outright Fraud by Lehigh Hanson...the Billion Dollar Worldwide Foreign Corporation owned by the HeidelbergCement Group.
Thank You For Visiting "My Fight 4 Justice" website.
If your ready to see this
"Smoking Gun Evidence"
- NOW just click on the picture below !
Send any comments, questions or suggestions to: firstname.lastname@example.org
As Joe Friday from "Dragnet" would say ....."Just the Facts Ma'am"