ITS OFFICIAL ... LEHIGH HANSON, THE MULTI - BILLION DOLLAR FOREIGN
CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS IN AMERICA AS A DELAWARE CORPORATION HAS EXPLAINED IN A COURT SUBMITTED SWORN "DECLARATION" HOW THEY DISCRIMINATE AGAINST INJURED AMERICAN WORKERS, BY PROVIDING HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS (DOCTORS) WITH BOGUS SECOND JOB DESCRIPTIONS AFTER A WORKER IS INJURED. HANSON HAS EXPLAINED IN A COURT SUBMITTED "DECLARATION" THAT THEY ONLY USE THESE SECOND JD'S "SOMETIMES." INJURED WORKERS CAN THEN BE TERMINATED BY USING THE UNSUSPECTING DOCTORS WHO OPINE THAT THEY CAN'T RETURN TO WORK WHICH IS BASED ON THE NEW JOB REQUIREMENTS FOUND ON HANSONS' FRAUDULENT SECOND JD'S.
WELCOME AND THANK YOU FOR VISITING MY WEBSITE WHICH WAS CREATED TO EXPOSE LEHIGH HANSONS ADMITTED/EXPLAINED BUSINESS PRACTICE OF FRAUD SINCE 1993. A BUSINESS PRACTICE WHICH WAS SUPPORTED BY THE CIVIL COURTS IN SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA. HERE ON MY WEBSITE YOU'LL SEE THOSE COURT SUBMITTED INCONTROVERTIBLE DOCUMENTS WHICH PROVE, BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, HOW HANSONS TWENTY PLUS YEAR FRAUD HAD GONE UNDETECTED SINCE 1993. I DISCOVERED THE DOCUMENT OF HANSONS' FRAUD IT IN MY LOST WRONGFUL TERMINATION CIVIL CASE FILES AFTER BEING REPRESENTED BY A "BROTHER OF THE BAR."
IF YOU ENJOY READING NON FICTION, COURT SUBMITTED PROOF, THEN YOU'VE COME TO THE RIGHT PLACE.
ENJOY READING THE COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE AND AS A WORD OF CAUTION... IF YOUR A SOUND BITE READER THEN YOU COULD MISS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HANSONS' COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE. THEREFORE, WHAT TOOK ME YEARS TO UNCOVER AND UNDERSTAND REQUIRES A COMPLETE AND THOROUGH REVIEW OF ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND HANSONS EXPLAINED FRAUD.
WHO AM I ?
I AM A U.S. VETERAN, HONORABLY DISCHARGED, WHO HAD HIS WORKING CAREER DESTROYED BY SELF SERVING LEHIGH HANSON EMPLOYEES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS WHO PROMOTED HANSONS' FRAUDULENT BUSINESS PRACTICE TO THE COURTS AS BEING SOMEHOW A LEGITIMATE PRACTICE. THE EVIDENCE SHOWS HOWEVER THAT I WAS FIRED BY HANSON IN NOVEMBER 2006, WHILE ON WORK COMP, BUT WAS NEVER NOTIFIED OF MY TERMINATION UNTIL ONE YEAR LATER IN NOVEMBER 2007. ACTUALLY HANSON IN ORDER TO KEEP MY TERMINATION SECRET DEFRAUDED MY REAL ESTATE BROKER IN JULY 2007 BY CLAIMING THAT I WAS STILL EMPLOYED AT HANSON BUT AS IT WAS LATER DISCOVERED IN LATE 2007 I HAD ALREADY BEEN FIRED NINE (9) MONTHS EARLIER IN NOVEMBER 2006.... SO WHATS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE ?
MY STORY IS ABOUT CORPORATE CORRUPTION, DECEPTION AND OUT-RITE FRAUD EXPLAINED IN THEIR OWN WORDS THROUGH A COURT SUBMITTED "DECLARATION" THAT WAS FILED BY HANSONS ATTORNEYS IN MY CIVIL ACTION CASE IN SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA.
HANSONS' SWORN DECLARATION THAT WAS SIGNED UNDER "PENALTIES OF PERJURY", EXPLAINS HANSONS' USE OF SECOND JOB DESCRIPTIONS THAT ARE GIVEN TO DOCTORS TO OPINE ON AFTER A WORKER IS INJURED!
SO WHAT'S UNIQUE ABOUT THESE SECOND JDS' YOU ASK ? WELL THEY ACTUALLY DRASTICALLY INCREASE THE ESSENTIAL JOB REQUIREMENTS, WORKING CONDITIONS, AND THEY CHANGE THE EDUCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS AS WELL FOR THE SAME JOB. THEY ARE THEN ADMITTEDLY USED BY HANSON AFTER WORKERS ARE INJURED. THIS ADMISSION EXPLAINS A FRAUDULENT AND DISCRIMINATORY BUSINESS PRACTICE WHICH HAD GONE UNDETECTED FOR OVER TWENTY YEARS UNTIL RECENTLY.
WHATS WRONG WITH THAT PICTURE?
IN THE CIVIL CASE I FILED IN SAN DIEGO, HANSONS SECOND JOB DESCRIPTION WAS DISCOVERED WITH A CREATION DATE OF 1993. HANSONS ATTORNEYS USED IT AS EVIDENCE IN MY "WRONGFUL TERMINATION" CASE AND AS ATTORNEYS THEY TOLD THE COURTS THAT IT WAS LEGIT BECAUSE IT HAD BEEN "PROPERLY AUTHENTICATED" BY HANSON.
SO WHY WOULD HANSON HAVE SECOND JD? IN MY OPINION, IT PROTECTS HANSONS INVESTORS BY DEFRAUDING DOCTORS TO GARNER A FAVORABLE OPINION ABOUT AN INJURED WORKERS ABILITY TO RETURN TO WORK AFTER AN INJURY. WITH THE INCREASED PHYSICAL JOB REQUIREMENTS, THIS ALLOWS A DOCTOR TO EASILY OPINE THAT INJURED WORKERS CANNOT RETURN TO HANSON AFTER AN INJURY. MY DOCTOR, FOR INSTANCE AT HIS DEPOSITION IN 2009 WAS GIVEN HANSONS BOGUS SECOND JD TO OPINE ON. HE STATED THAT I COULD NOT RETURN TO MY JOB BECAUSE OF WHAT HE READ ON HANSONS FRAUDULENT SECOND JOB DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENTS. NICE SCAM THAT'S BEEN GOING ON, ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN DOCUMENTS FOR OVER TWENTY PLUS YEARS. NOW THE ONLY QUESTION REMAINING, WITH ALL THIS EVIDENCE EXPOSED, IS WHO IS GOING TO HOLD HANSON ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR FRAUD?
HANSONS' FABRICATED FRAUD ALLOWS HANSON TO JUSTIFY THE TERMINATION OF INJURED WORKERS BY USING UNSUSPECTING DOCTORS AS THEIR SCAPEGOATS. HOW SLICK! THIS DOCUMENT ALSO SETS A PRESIDENT WHICH OUTLINES HANSONS BUSINESS MODEL FRAUD.
THIS IS ONE EXAMPLE OF THE KIND OF EVIDENCE YOU'LL FIND HERE ON MY WEBSITE. SO IF YOUR READY TO VIEW THIS PROOF I'LL DIRECT YOU BELOW TO THE EVIDENCE BY CLICKING THE PICTURE BELOW.
MY HOME PAGE EXPLAINS SOME OF THE FACTS ABOUT THE EVIDENCE FOUND ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES. THERE YOU CAN READ WRITTEN LETTERS I SENT TO BOTH CORPORATE CEO' AND HANSONS' ATTORNEYS ALONG WITH ACTUAL COURT SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS THAT PROVE MY FINDINGS.
EXPOSING HANSONS' ADMITTED BUSINESS PRACTICE
AS MENTIONED, THE COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE OF THIS FRAUD IS FOUND IN HANSONS' COURT SUBMITTED "DECLARATION," SIGNED UNDER "PENALTIES OF PERJURY." AND ACCORDING TO HANSONS' SECOND JD ITSELF.... HANSONS' FRAUD WAS CREATED AND PLACED INTO EFFECT IN 1993.
SOME HAVE STATED, AFTER READING THIS INCONTROVERTIBLE EVIDENCE, THAT THEY CAN'T BELIEVE HANSON WOULD HAVE EVER TRIED TO EXPLAIN, OR FOR THAT MATTER ACTUALLY EXPLAINED, A TWENTY PLUS YEAR FRAUD. BUT THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HANSON HAS DONE AND THAT EXPLANATION IS FOUND IN HANSONS' "SMOKING GUN" SWORN "DECLARATION" THAT CAN BE READ HERE.
THE EXPLANATION OF HANSONS' USE OF SECOND JOB DESCRIPTIONS CAME IN A CIVIL CASE AGAINST HANSON FOR FRAUD. IT WAS AT THIS TIME WHEN HANSONS' ATTORNEYS TOLD THE COURT THAT HANSONS SECOND JD HAD BEEN "PROPERLY AUTHENTICATED" AND THAT IT WAS JUST "MORE DETAILED" THAN THE REAL JOB DESCRIPTION FOR THE SAME JOB. HOWEVER A CLOSE EXAMINATION OF THE TWO JD'S IN QUESTION FINDS THAT THE SECOND JD ACTUALLY INCREASES SOME CRITICAL JOB REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SAME JOB. BELOW I'LL ADDRESS HANSONS' SUPPOSED "PROPERLY AUTHENTICATED" REPLY BY THEIR ATTORNEYS TO THE COURTS SHORTLY.
EXPOSING HANSONS FRAUD WHICH WAS WELL HIDDEN
AS YOU READ THIS EVIDENCE, KEEP IN MIND THAT HANSON MUST HAVE NEVER CONSIDERED THAT THEY WOULD BE CAUGHT DEFRAUDING SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES OR MY DOCTOR AT HIS DEPOSITION. IT WAS, I BELIEVE, ALL ABOUT OBTAINING A HANSON "WIN." AS IT TURNS OUT WHICH WAS DISCOVERED YEARS LATER, AFTER THE FACT, HANSONS' SECOND JD WAS USED AT MY DOCTORS DEPOSITION FOR HIM TO OPINE ON. A JOB DESCRIPTION THAT MY DOCTOR HAD REQUESTED NUMEROUS TIMES THREE YEARS BEFORE HIS DEPOSITION WHICH HE NEEDED TO FINALIZE HIS P&S REPORT PAPERWORK. HIS REQUESTS WERE MADE IN 2006 AND AGAIN IN 2007 TO HANSONS' REPRESENTATIVES WHICH FELL ON DEAF EARS.
AS IT TURNS OUT... THE EVIDENCE PROVES THAT HANSONS BOGUS SECOND JOB DESCRIPTION WAS ACTUALLY GIVEN TO MY DOCTOR THE MORNING OF HIS DEPOSITION IN AUGUST 2009 BY MY OWN ATTORNEY. WOW !!! AND AFTER HE WAS QUESTIONED THAT MORNING USING HANSONS' BOGUS SECOND JD, IT WAS THEN SUBMITTED INTO EVIDENCE BY HANSONS ATTORNEY, ROBYN WOFFORD. THIS MADE THAT DOCUMENT AT THAT TIME A COURT RECORD.
WHATS INTERESTING IS THAT HANSONS' SECOND JD, WAS SUBMITTED AFTER HANSONS SAME ATTORNEY, ROBYN WOFFORD, HAD ALREADY PLACED HANSONS' REAL JD FOR MY JOB INTO EVIDENCE AT MY DEPOSITION TEN MONTHS EARLIER IN NOVEMBER 2008. AND WHATS EVEN MORE INTERESTING IS THAT ROBYN WOFFORD, NEVER ONCE MENTIONED THAT SHE WAS USING HANSONS' TWO QUITE DIFFERENT JOB DESCRIPTIONS AT TWO DIFFERENT DEPOSITIONS, MINE AND MY DOCTORS.
I BELIEVE SHE JUST IGNORED THIS FACT BECAUSE SHE WAS SEEKING AN ANSWER FROM MY DOCTOR INDICATING THAT I COULD NOT DO MY JOB. THIS DECEPTIVE MOVE DEFINITELY HELPED TO SECURE A "WIN" FOR HER CLIENT LEHIGH HANSON IN MY WRONGFUL TERMINATION CASE .
WHAT'S UNIQUE ABOUT HANSONS SECOND JD'S ARE THAT THEY DRASTICALLY INCREASE SOME OF THE CRITICAL JOB REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SAME JOB. AS AN EXAMPLE: THE LIFTING REQUIREMENTS FOR MY JOB ALONE GO FROM HAVING TO LIFT UP TO 50 POUNDS, HANSONS' PRE - INJURY JOB REQUIREMENT, TO NOW HAVING TO LIFT OVER 100 PLUS POUNDS DAILY ... POST INJURY. THESE NEW JOB REQUIREMENTS ARE ONLY FOUND ON HANSONS' SECOND JD'S WHICH HANSON ADMITTEDLY USES "SOMETIMES" "AFTER" A WORKER IS INJURED.
HANSONS' SECOND JD'S, AS EXPLAINED, ARE GIVEN TO DOCTORS TO OPINE ON. AND WITH THE UNBELIEVABLE ADMISSION OF THERE USE BY HANSONS EMPLOYEES... THIS PROVES A BUSINESS MODEL THAT NOT ONLY DECEIVES UNSUSPECTING DOCTORS BUT IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST HANSONS' INJURED WORKERS WHICH HAS BEEN ONGOING SINCE 1993 .
WHATS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?
I HAD BEEN IN LITIGATION FOR OVER EIGHT LONG YEARS TRYING TO EXPOSE THIS FRAUD TO NO AVAIL ... SO FAR! THE STORY OF THESE EVENTS AND THE DESTRUCTION OF MY CAREER IS PROVEN BY ACTUAL INCONTROVERTIBLE COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE.
HOW HANSON IMPLEMENTED THEIR FRAUD, TO OBTAIN THEIR "WINS" IS A FASCINATING STORY WHICH TO SOME WILL SOUND UNBELIEVABLE I'M SURE. I BELIEVE THAT HANSON NEVER THOUGHT THAT I COULD, OR ANYONE ELSE FOR THAT MATTER, PUT THE PIECES OF THIS TWISTED DECEITFUL PUZZLE TOGETHER BUT I HAVE.. AND THE EVIDENCE IS HERE AND IS VERY REVEALING AND DISTURBING. ITS A STORY OF CORRUPTION, COLLUSION AND OUTRIGHT FRAUD BY A FOREIGN CORPORATION WHO IS STILL DOING BUSINESS HERE IN AMERICA.
AFTER EIGHT PLUS YEARS IN LITIGATION IT APPEARS FROM THE EVIDENCE I HAVE UNCOVERED, THAT HANSONS ADMITTED BUSINESS PRACTICE IS BEING DELIBERATELY OVERLOOKED OR IS BEING SUPPORTED BY OUR OWN JUST-US LEGAL SYSTEM. I SAY THIS BECAUSE OF THE RULINGS I HAVE RECEIVED IN THREE RELATED CIVIL CASES, ANY ONE OF WHICH, WOULD HAVE EXPOSED HANSONS ADMITTED FRAUD. BUT MY EVIDENCE WAS BLOCKED.
HANSONS BUSINESS PRACTICE OF SCREWING ITS INJURED WORKERS AND DEFRAUDING DOCTORS HAD GONE UNDETECTED FOR DECADES UNTIL I DISCOVERED THEIR SECOND JD IN MY "DISMISSED" "LOST" WRONGFUL TERMINATION CASE IN 2010. DID THE JUSTICE SYSTEM CARE ABOUT THIS PROOF WHEN IT WAS PRESENTED TO THEM AS EVIDENCE IN TWO ADDITIONAL RELATED CIVIL CASES? APPARENTLY NOT... DEMONSTRATED BY THEIR RULINGS. AND TO MAKE MATTERS WORSE, THE APPELLATE COURT JUSTICES, AFTER SEEING THIS EVIDENCE AND EVEN POINTED OUT THE TWO "QUITE DIFFERENT" JD'S... ACTUALLY CREATED AN EXCUSE, IN THEIR RULINGS, WHICH ALLOWED THEM TO ADJUDICATE THAT CASE. AND DUE TO THIS FACT THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED HERE HAS NOT YET BEEN SEEN OR ADDRESSED BY A JURY OF MY PEERS.
FILING TWO COMPLAINTS AFTER HANSONS' SECOND JDS' DISCOVERY
AFTER DISCOVERING HANSONS' SECOND JD IN MY LOST WRONGFUL TERMINATION CASE FILES, I FILED TWO CIVIL COMPLAINTS AGAINST HANSON AND THEIR ATTORNEYS FOR FRAUD AND AGAINST MY FORMER FIRST ATTORNEY, HARRY HARRISON, FOR PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE. MY ATTORNEY NEVER QUESTIONING OR OBJECTED TO HANSONS USE OF TWO JDS' WHICH WERE GIVEN TO HIM IN MY "WRONGFUL TERMINATION" CASE IN 2009. HANSON HAD ACTUALLY GIVEN HIM THREE JD'S DURING THAT CASE. TWO WERE IDENTICAL BUT DISPLAYED TWO DIFFERENT HANSON COMPANY NAMES. THE THIRD ONE, WHICH IS THE FRAUDULENT, WILL REFER TO IT HERE AS HANSONS' SECOND JD.
IN THE HANSON FRAUD CASE FILED IN 2012, SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE BARTON BLAMED MY ATTORNEY HARRISON FOR NOT CATCHING HANSONS' FRAUDULENT SECOND JD TO MAKE IT A TRIABLE ISSUE. HARRISON NEVER ONCE OBJECTED TO HANSONS' USE OF THAT SECOND JD IN MY CIVIL CASE WHICH HE HAD RECEIVED MONTHS BEFORE MY JOB WAS ADJUDICATED AT HANSONS 1ST MSJ HEARING IN JULY 2009 BY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE HOFFMAN. IT WAS AN EASY CALL BECAUSE HARRISON SUBMITTED PAPERWORK TO THE COURTS THAT STATED HANSONS MOVE WAS "UNDISPUTED." HOW NICE!
WHEN ALL THIS WAS GOING ON BETWEEN 2008 AND 2010, I WAS TOTALLY UNAWARE OF THESE FACTS. AND CONTRARY TO POPULAR BELIEF, MY "SKIN IN THE GAME" WAS "ONLY" MY CONTINUED CAREER AND MY FUTURE FULL RETIREMENT BENEFITS FROM THE UNION AND SOCIAL SECURITY... THAT'S ALL!
"DISCOVERY" DURING THE HANSON CASE FOR FRAUD
AFTER MY "WRONGFUL TERMINATION" CIVIL CASE WAS LOST, AND DURING THE DISCOVERY PHASE IN MY CASE AGAINST HANSON FOR FRAUD, I PRESENTED HANSONS SECOND JOB DESCRIPTION TO HANSONS ATTORNEYS AS EVIDENCE FOR THEM TO OPINE ON. SINCE HANSON HAD SUBMITTED THEIR SECOND JD INTO EVIDENCE TO HELP SECURE A WIN, HANSON WAS NOW FORCED TO EXPLAIN ITS USE. THIS IS WHEN HANSON RESPONDED WITH THEIR EXPLANATION OF ITS USE WHICH IS FOUND IN THEIR SWORN "DECLARATION" LOCATED HERE ON MY WEBSITE.
FYI: HANSONS' ATTORNEYS WERE SLICK AND DECEPTIVE BY NEVER USING HANSONS' SECOND JDS' CORRECT TITLE "CONCRETE MIXER TRUCK DRIVER POSITION DESCRIPTION" ON THE PAPERWORK THEY SUBMITTED TO THE COURTS. INSTEAD THEY ONLY REFERENCED TO IT BY EXHIBIT NUMBER ONLY. QUESTION: IF IT WAS A LEGITIMATE "PROPERLY AUTHENTICATED" DOCUMENT, WHY NOT USE ITS CORRECT TITLE IN BOLD LETTERS? ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF A DECEPTIVE MOVE BY BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF THE BAR.
TO DATE HANSONS FRAUD HAS NOT YET BEEN ADDRESSED. NO QUESTIONS HAVE EVER BEEN ASKED AS WHY THEY THINK ITS OK TO CREATE ALTERED SECOND JD'S WHICH ARE USED TO DEFRAUD DOCTORS AND DISCRIMINATE AGAINST INJURED WORKERS "SOMETIMES"... SINCE 1993. NO ONE AT HANSON OR THEIR ATTORNEYS HAVE EVER BEEN HELD ACCOUNTABLE OR ASKED ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT HANSONS' "ADMITTED" USE OF SECOND JD'S "SOMETIMES."
BRIEF OUTLINE OF EVENTS
AFTER SEEKING JUSTICE IN THE SAN DIEGO CIVIL COURT SYSTEM TRYING TO EXPOSE THIS FRAUD, HANSONS EXPLAINED FRAUDULENT BUSINESS PRACTICE COULD VERY WELL STILL BE IN EFFECT TODAY SINCE IT HAS NEVER BEEN EXPOSED. AND WHY NOT? THEY WERE GIVEN A PASS BY THE JUSTICES IN THE APPELLATE COURT IN SAN DIEGO AFTER BEING GIVEN THIS EVIDENCE TO REVIEW AT MY SECOND APPEAL. I ACTUALLY SUBMITTED 1070 PAGES OF EVIDENCE IN MY SECOND APPEAL IN MY CASE AGAINST HARRISON WHICH CLEARLY OUTLINED HANSONS ADMITTED BUSINESS PRACTICE IN DETAIL.
HOWEVER THIS EVIDENCE WAS DISREGARDED BY THE JUSTICES AND THEIR FINAL RULING RESULTED IN THE DISMISSAL OF THAT RELATED CIVIL CASE. THE APPEAL PROCESS TOOK THREE YEARS FOR THE JUSTICES TO RENDER THEIR FINAL DECISION.
HOW COULD THIS OF HAPPENED YOU ASK? WELL IN MY OPINION AFTER THOSE THREE APPELLATE COURT JUSTICES SAW MY 1070 PAGES OF DAMMING EVIDENCE, I BELIEVE THEY HAD A REVELATION. I BELIEVE THEY REALIZED THAT IF THEY WERE TO LET ME AND THIS EVIDENCE INTO A TRIAL, IT WOULD NOT ONLY EXPOSE HANSONS' TWENTY PLUS YEAR FRAUD, BUT IT WOULD ALSO HAVE EXPOSED THEIR FELLOW BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF THE BAR INVOLVEMENT IN THE COVER-UP OF THESE FACTS IN ALL THOSE RELATED CASES. I ALSO BELIEVE THIS TO BE TRUE BECAUSE THIS EVIDENCE FROM ALL THREE CASES PAINTS A VERY DISTURBING PICTURE THAT, IN MY OPINION, THE "FIX" WAS IN.
IN ORDER FOR THE JUSTICES TO KEEP THIS EVIDENCE OUT OF COURT, THEY HAD TO CREATE AN "EXCUSE." I SAY THIS BECAUSE THERE IS NO WRITTEN HARD EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THEIR RULING AND THEREFORE IT'S JUST THEIR OPINION. THEIR "EXCUSE" HOWEVER ALLOWED MY CIVIL CASE TO BE THROWN OUT... OR IN LEGAL TERMS... ADJUDICATED!
MY EVIDENCE / PROOF THEREFORE WAS BLOCKED FROM BEING SEEN BY A JURY OF MY PEERS WHO WILL DECIDE SOMEDAY IF HANSON CAN USE MULTIPLE JDS' BEFORE AND AFTER A WORKER IS HIRED AND INJURED. SO MY FIGHT 4 JUSTICE CONTINUES NOW INTO 2017.
THE DISCOVERY OF LEHIGH HANSONS TWENTY PLUS YEAR FRAUD WAS SHARED WITH BOTH HEIDELBERG-CEMENT GROUP AND HANSONS' CEO'S IN 2012. HOWEVER, AFTER SENDING THIS EVIDENCE TO THEM CERTIFIED MAIL... THEY BOTH CHOSE TO REFUSE TO ADDRESS THESE FACTS PERSONALLY. INSTEAD THEY HAD THEIR ATTORNEY, CLAUDETTE WILSON, RESPOND ON THEIR BEHALF. MY LETTERS WRITTEN TO BOTH CEO'S IN 2012 AND MS. WILSON'S RESPONSE LETTER CAN BE READ HERE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES. HANSON CAN RUN... BUT THEY CANNOT HIDE FROM THEIR OWN COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE THAT EXPLAINS A TWENTY PLUS YEAR FRAUD... SINCE 1993.
THIS EVIDENCE WILL EVENTUALLY BE EXPOSED, THAT IM SURE. I JUST DON'T KNOW WHEN. ITS SITUATIONS LIKE THESE THAT CREATES GROWING OUTCRIES THAT OUR JUST-US SYSTEM IS CORRUPT AND NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED AND OVERHAULED TO PROTECT ALL AMERICAN WORKERS IN THE FUTURE... INJURED OR NOT.
I HAVE THE ERIN BROCKOVICH INCONTROVERTIBLE "SMOKING GUN" TYPE EVIDENCE AND ALL I NEED NOW IS SOMEONE WITH "TEETH" TO INVESTIGATE AND BRING CHARGES AGAINST HANSONS' EXPLAINED FRAUD. MAYBE OUR NEW PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, WHO LOVES U.S. VETERANS AND WHO DOES NOT LIKE VETERANS BEING SCREWED... ESPECIALLY BY A FOREIGN CORPORATION LIKE HANSON AND HEIDELBERG FROM GERMANY MAY BECOME THE "TEETH" NEEDED. WILL HAVE TO WAIT AND SEE WHO STEPS TO THE PLATE!
NO CORPORATION NO MATTER HOW POWERFUL, FOREIGN OR DOMESTIC SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO DODGE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR BREAKING US FEDERAL LAW. THE COURTS NEED TO DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY FOR HANSONS' EXPLAINED FRAUD AGAINST DOCTORS AND INJURED AMERICAN WORKERS.
AN INTERESTING FACT:
I READ AN ARTICLE FROM SAN DIEGO WHERE ONE OF THE HANSON ATTORNEYS FROM MY CIVIL CASE WAS INTERVIEWED. AND AS THE ARTICLE POINTED OUT, THIS PARTICULAR ATTORNEY BEFORE ACTUALLY BECOMING AN ATTORNEY, QUIT A JOB AT A LAW FIRM IN THE 70'S WHEN ASKED TO BACK-DATE DOCUMENTS USED IN COMPLAINTS.
NOW DECADES LATER AS AN ATTORNEY, THE VALUES SHE ONCE ARTICULATED IN HER INTERVIEW APPARENTLY ARE NOW GONE. SHE NEEDED TO PROTECT HER BIG CLIENT HANSON SO ONE THING SHE DID WAS TO BACKDATE A BILLING STATEMENT THAT COINCIDED WITH HER CO-COUNSELS BILLING DATE. AND GET THIS, THEIR BILLING WAS FOR THE REVIEW AND SUBMISSION OF HANSONS "SMOKING GUN" "DECLARATION" INTO EVIDENCE. YES ITS THE SAME "DECLARATION" THAT EXPLAINS HANSONS USE OF SECOND JDS' "SOMETIMES." WOAH !!! DID YOU JUST READ THAT ?
THIS STORY MAY SEEM UNBELIEVABLE TO MANY BECAUSE "DECEPTION" IS A DESPICABLE TOOL THAT'S USED BY MANY. HOWEVER THESE ARE THE FACTS SUPPORTED BY HANSONS OWN "COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE." HANSONS ATTORNEYS APPARENTLY SAW NO PROBLEM WITH THEIR CLIENTS USE OF SECOND JD'S "SOMETIMES." WHAT THE HECK... IF IT HELPS TO SECURE A "WIN".. WHY NOT USE THEM ESPECIALLY IF YOU THINK YOU'LL NEVER BE CAUGHT.... WRONG AGAIN !
SINCE HANSONS' SMOKING GUN "DECLARATION" WAS PLACED INTO EVIDENCE BY HANSONS ATTORNEYS, I BELIEVE THAT I SHOULD BE THANKING THEM FOR EXPOSING THEIR CLIENTS TWENTY PLUS YEAR ADMITTED FRAUD WHICH IS A FRAUDULENT BUSINESS PRACTICE SINCE 1993.
LEHIGH HANSON OPERATES WORLDWIDE INCLUDING AMERICA. WHEN HANSON WAS CALLED OUT ABOUT THEIR USE OF SECOND JDS', THIS IS WHEN THEY EXPLAINED THAT THEY WERE ONLY USED "SOMETIMES" AS THOUGH THAT SOMEHOW MAKES A DIFFERENCE! LEHIGH HANSON, FORMALLY KNOWN AS HANSON AGGREGATES PACIFIC SOUTHWEST INC. (PSW) WAS PURCHASED BY THE HEIDELBERG_CEMENT GROUP FOR 15.8 BILLION DOLLARS IN AUGUST 2007. HANSON AGGREGATES PSW WAS THEN RENAMED AND IS NOW KNOWN TODAY AS LEHIGH HANSON.
HISTORY ABOUT THIS INCONTROVERTIBLE EVIDENCE
HANSONS ADMITTED FRAUD IS VERY DISTURBING TO SAY THE LEAST. HANSON STATED, FOR WHAT ITS WORTH, THAT THEIR SECOND JOB DESCRIPTIONS (JD) ARE ONLY USED "SOMETIMES" AFTER A WORKER IS INJURED. "SOMETIMES" ???.
WHAT EXACTLY ARE THE QUALIFICATIONS FOR HANSONS' USE OF THESE SECOND JD'S ? IS IT IF YOUR AN INJURED BLACK, HISPANIC, FEMALE, OR MAYBE YOUR JUST NOT LIKED OR ARE JUST TO OLD... IS THIS WHEN HANSON WHIPS OUT THEIR SPECIAL SECOND JOB DESCRIPTIONS TO GIVE DOCTORS TO OPINE ON? SECOND JDS" THAT MAY INFLUENCE DOCTORS OPINIONS AS TO WHETHER OR NOT INJURED WORKERS CAN RETURN TO WORK AFTER AN INJURY? THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED TO ME! MY DOCTOR WAS DECEIVED AT HIS DEPOSITION BY HANSONS QUESTIONS AND UNBELIEVABLY BY MY OWN ATTORNEY HARRY HARRISON WHO GAVE HANSONS SECOND BOGUS JD TO MY DOCTOR THE MORNING OF HIS DEPOSITION TO OPINE ON.
IF YOU FIND THESE FACTS ABOVE UNBELIEVABLE THEN YOU CAN VERIFY THESES FACTS BY READING HANSONS "DECLARATION" FOR YOURSELF ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES.
WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?
IN THREE RELATED CIVIL CASES, HANSON'S ATTORNEYS TOLD THE COURTS THAT HANSONS' SECOND JD HAD BEEN "PROPERLY AUTHENTICATED" FOR USE BY HANSON. THE BURNING QUESTING NOW BECOMES... HOW CAN ANY CORPORATION "PROPERLY AUTHENTICATE" A FRAUD WHICH, AS IN THIS CASE, HAS BEEN ONGOING SINCE 1993... AN ORCHESTRATED EXPLAINED FRAUDULENT BUSINESS PRACTICE BY HANSON! HOW DOES THAT WORK, ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE WAS A UNION CONTRACT THAT IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL LAWS?
"A TWENTY PLUS YEAR FRAUD"
DO YOU FIND IT UNBELIEVABLE THAT HANSON HAS EXPLAINED A TWENTY PLUS YEAR FRAUDULENT BUSINESS PRACTICE IN A SWORN "DECLARATION" ? MAYBE THEY THOUGHT NO ONE WOULD BE PAYING ATTENTION TO A FRAUDULENT BUSINESS PRACTICE AIMED SQUARELY AT INJURED WORKERS AND AMERICAN DOCTORS. UNBELIEVABLE!
I BELIEVE THAT WHEN THESE FACTS ARE EXPOSED, HANSON WILL BE FORCED TO EXPLAIN THIS FRAUD. IM LOOKING FORWARD TO SEE HOW MANY HANSON ATTORNEYS WILL TRY TO DEFEND THE INDEFENSIBLE.
I ALSO BELIEVE THAT WHEN THIS EVIDENCE IS INVESTIGATED, HANSONS' ATTORNEYS WILL TRY TO "SOUNDBITE" AND "SPIN" THEIR WAY OUT OF THEIR CREATED MESS. I ALSO BELIEVE THAT ONE GAME PLAN MAY INCLUDE TRYING TO MAKE THIS DAMMING EVIDENCE SOMEHOW DISAPPEAR. HOWEVER, ITS TOO LATE TO HIDE THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM AND TO MANY PEOPLE HAVE NOW VIEWED THIS EVIDENCE.
I BELIEVE WHEN THIS PROOF IS INVESTIGATED HANSON MAY TRY TO CLAIM THAT I AM JUST A DISGRUNTLED FORMER EMPLOYEE OUT TO SMEAR HANSON'S NAME. FOR THE RECORD.... I HAVE GIVEN HANSON AMPLE OPPORTUNITIES TO ADDRESS THIS EVIDENCE TO NO AVAIL. THEIR STANDARD RESPONSE IS "THE COURTS HAVE SPOKEN." WELL DUH.. AFTER THE COURTS WERE DEFRAUDED BY HANSONS' ATTORNEYS BY THEIR USE OF HANSONS' SECOND JDS' TO GET A DISMISSAL OF MY CIVIL CASE . HOW PATHETIC!
I AM NOT, FOR THOSE WONDERING, A FORMER DISGRUNTLED EMPLOYEE AT HANSON. THIS IS PROVEN BY THE "SERVICE AWARD" I WAS GIVEN FOR MY LOYALTY OF SERVICE TO HANSON. THIS AWARD WAS PRESENTED BEFORE MY INJURY AND BEFORE HANSON SECRETLY DUMPED ME LIKE A PIECE OF TRASH IN 2006.
I HAVE BEEN WAITING EIGHT PLUS YEARS TO PRESENT THIS EVIDENCE IN A COURT OF LAW TO SHOW WHAT HANSON DELIBERATELY DID TO ME AND MY FAMILY. THE COURT JUSTICES IN SAN DIEGO HOWEVER BLOCKED MY ACCESS TO A FAIR TRIAL AND IN DOING SO VIOLATED MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO BE HEARD.
I HAVE NOT EXPOSED THESE FACTS PUBLICLY YET BECAUSE JON MORRISH, HANSONS NEW CEO, PROBABLY WAS UNAWARE OF THIS EVIDENCE. SO I RECENTLY REACHED OUT TO HIM AS A COURTESY.
FOR MY EFFORTS IN TRYING TO REACH OUT TO JON MORRISH, HANSONS' NEW CEO, I WAS RESPONDED TO WITH THE STANDARD "THE COURTS HAVE SPOKEN" MIDDLE FINGER RESPONSE. I HELD OFF EXPOSING THESE FACTS THINKING SOMEONE AT HANSON HAD SOME ADULT QUALITIES BUT I WAS WRONG. SINCE DAN HARRINGTON WHO I WROTE TO RETIRED SUDDENLY, I WANTED TO GIVE HANSONS NEW CEO ONE LAST CHANCE TO ADDRESS THIS EVIDENCE TO MAKE GOOD ON THEIR EMPLOYEES ADMITTED FRAUD. HOWEVER WITH HANSONS' RECENT MIDDLE FINGER REPLY ONCE AGAIN I AM DONE.
I HAVE NO INTENTION OF BACKING DOWN UNTIL THIS FRAUD IS EXPOSED AND HANSONS EMPLOYEES ARE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF MY CAREER AND RETIREMENT. I THOUGHT THAT HANSONS NEW CEO, JON MORRISH, WOULD WANT TO CORRECT THIS TERRIBLE WRONG AFTER I EMAILED THESE FACTS TO HIS NEW SECRETARY, JULIE RODRIGUEZ. JULIE ASSURED ME THAT MY CORRESPONDENCE EVIDENCE WOULD BE DELIVERED TO MR MORRISH. HOWEVER I WAS LIED TO ONCE AGAIN ADDRESSED BELOW.
I JUST RECEIVED AN EMAIL RESPONSE FROM MS RODRIGUEZ WHO STATED THAT I AM NOT TO CONTACT HER EVER AGAIN AND THAT "THE COURTS HAVE SPOKEN." APPARENTLY SHE IS LISTENING TO HANSONS LEGAL CRONIES AND IS NOT PERSONALLY AWARE OF THIS EVIDENCE AND FACTS. THEREFORE MY LAST EARNEST ATTEMPT, AS A COURTESY TO JON MORRISH, HAS ENDED.... IM DONE!
APPARENTLY MR. MORRISH HAS DECIDED TO IGNORE THIS EVIDENCE, LIKE HIS PREDECESSOR DAN HARRINGTON DID IN 2012. HOW SAD! I AM NOW FORCED INTO THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL ARENA AND INTO THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION TO EXPOSE HANSONS UNEXPLAINED AND UNADDRESSED ADMITTED FRAUD.
WHEN THESE FACTS ARE EXPOSED IT SHOULD FLUSH OUT THE PLAYERS WHO HAVE COVERED UP THIS EVIDENCE. EVIDENCE THAT EXPLAINS HANSONS' ADMITTED BUSINESS PRACTICES WHICH ALLOWS THE TERMINATION OF HANSONS' INJURED WORKERS "SOMETIMES" BY USING DOCTORS TO DO THEIR DIRTY WORK FOR THEM. WHAT A SCAM BUT ONE THAT HAS BEEN DISCOVERED.
ONE THING IS CERTAIN, WHEN THIS EVIDENCE IS EXPOSED WE MAY FIND OUT HOW MANY OTHER INJURED WORKERS WERE TERMINATED SINCE 1993 BY HANSONS ADMITTED USE OF THEIR SPECIAL SECOND JD'S. HANSONS' "SMOKING GUN" "DECLARATION" WHICH EXPLAINS HANSONS' FRAUD SETS A PRESIDENT WHICH WILL BE IMPOSSIBLE TO DEFEND BECAUSE ITS HANSONS' OWN COURT SUBMITTED EVIDENCE THAT EXPLAINS THEIR FRAUD.
AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED... HOW DARE THEY THINK THAT THEY CAN DESTROY A U.S. VETERANS WORKING CAREER AND HIS FAMILY JUST BECAUSE THEY HAVE A FEW EXTRA BUCKS IN THE BANK. ITS NOW ALL ABOUT ACCOUNTABILITY !!!!!!
THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF MY CAREER WILL SOON BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN WHY THEY THINK IT'S OK TO USE BOGUS SECOND JD'S "SOMETIMES" AND THEY CAN ALSO EXPLAIN WHY THEY BELIEVE ITS LEGAL TO INCREASE THE JOB REQUIREMENTS AFTER A WORKER IS INJURED BY GIVING THOSE BOGUS JDS' TO DOCTORS TO OPINE ON. A GREAT PLAN IF YOUR NEVER CAUGHT! JON MORRISH OR HIS REPRESENTATIVES, HAVE MADE THEIR DECISION. THEREFORE HANSON CAN NOW EXPLAIN THEIR FRAUD IN A FEDERAL CRIMINAL COURT OF LAW.
IN MY EXPERIENCES THROUGHOUT THESE THREE RELATED CIVIL CASES I HAVE LEARNED THAT
"In America...is NOT for all Americans"
When a criminal investigation is launched, my 1070 pages of evidence will be submitted once again for review. It will expose Hanson's explained use of their Second JDs' 'Sometimes" since 1993 again!
Many have suggested that those responsible for blocking my access to a civil trial should be investigated in order to identify the players involved in this massive cover-up. Unless there is written hard evidence that proves that the Appellate Court justices were mislead and defrauded by defense Attorney Timothy Noon, who defended my former attorneys actions, those justices may also become part of that investigation. It's a fact that they were given 1070 pages of damming evidence, but in the end chose to dismiss my civil case none the less.
One justice even pointed out to the defense attorney Timothy Noon, at my First Appeal oral argument hearing, that there are "two quite different Hanson job descriptions here Mr. Noon." This is and always has been the Triable Issue as to whether or not Hanson is legally allowed to use two vastly different JDs'... one before a person is hired and a second one after a person is injured. We shall see!
Even though the justices acknowledged Hansons' use of two "QUITE DIFFERENT" JDS' it didn't change the outcome of the case. They identified the triable issue which should have gone to a jury for a decision. However that didn't happen! Instead they created an "excuse" and dismissed my case that blocked me from a jury trial.
FYI: In order for those Justices to have thrown out my case for the reasons they cited, the only logical conclusion is that they must have been given Written Hard Evidence by Noons defense team that was not shared with me to respond to as a pro per litigant. Hard evidence that proves my first attorney, Harrison, had engaged in what the justices stated was a "New Litigation Strategy" before he walked out on my Wrongful Termination case in 2010. The justices said that I needed an Expert Witness (another attorney) to explain Harrisons' "New Litigation Strategy" to judge Taylor. And since an expert was not provided by me to explain Harrisons' supposed New Litigation Strategy, which I was never informed of and knew nothing about ... I lose?
FYI: First off, had I known that Harrison had a "New Litigation Strategy" doesn't it stand to reason that I would have provided an expert witness especially after being involved in litigation for numerous years to expose Hansons' fraud? But how can someone produce an expert witness to explain a "New Litigation Strategy" when that strategy was NEVER shared with me by Harrison ever? HELLO DUH !!!!
Evil Prevails when good men and women stand by and do NOTHING!
"Caution Your About To Enter The No Spin Zone" If the evidence here is not studied carefully, my statements could easily be taken out of context and/or sound unbelievable. Therefore please do not "Sound Bite" or "Skim" through these facts located on the following pages. How could any intelligent person have missed the obvious differences between Hanson's two submitted JD's and not question their differences or their legality? But thats exactly what happened. The elephant somehow made it through the room undetected... How Sad.
Judges understandably have tremendous work loads and therefore rely heavily on the "Honesty" of their Brothers and Sisters of the bar and court readers to not mislead them into error. The submitted evidence here proves that some attorney's lied and did so frequently to these same judges. For Example; Some attorneys states that both JDS' are the same in "RELATIVE ASPECTS" and that Hansons' SECOND JDS" are just more DETAILED.
This is an OBVIOUS bald face LIE as you will see when you review both JDS' in question for yourself. Are those lies being overlooked to protect the attorneys and Hansons' admitted use of SECOND JD's ? Time will tell! There is a lot of finger pointing going on here between the attorneys, judges and now the justices. Therefore its time to expose this evidence and get it out in the open.
In Closing: If you choose to read the evidence you will discover other interesting facts as well. Such as the written correspondences previously mentioned that were sent to both CEO's at HeidelbergCement Group and Lehigh Hanson. And the letter sent to the VP of of Hansons' HR department to give them all a heads up of my discovery of Hansons' SECOND JD found in my civil case files.
In my opinion Hansons' use of never before seen SECOND JD's that are admittedly given to doctors to opine on is a Fraud pure and simple. JD's that change some Working Conditions and Essential Functions 100 plus percent for the same job and used "AFTER" a worker is injured is total B.S. !
What I have experienced in my three civil cases by those entrusted to protect my Constitutional Rights to a jury trial is illustrated in the picture below ...
A Closing Thought
The Seventh Amendment (Amendment VII) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. This amendment codifies the right to a jury trial in certain civil cases, and inhibits courts from overturning a jury's findings of fact.
I believe the game being played here by the Just - Us crowd in San Diego, is to keep the plaintiff out of court who has damming evidence so you don't have to worry about a jury's findings.
My Fight 4 Justice has been an uphill battle for several years. When you read the evidence presented here and if you understand what you have read and the impact it has, then all Im asking is for help to get the word out about these Facts and Evidence to others.
Please share www.myfight4justice.com with your friends and family on Facebook, Twitter or any other social media outlets that may alert Investigative Reporters and the Press to this evidence.
This court submitted evidence will someday be exposed and when it does it will protect other American families from this ADMITTED Discrimination, Abuse and outright Fraud by Lehigh Hanson...the Billion Dollar Worldwide Foreign Corporation owned by the HeidelbergCement Group.
Thank You For Visiting "My Fight 4 Justice" website.
If your ready to view this
"Smoking Gun Evidence"
- just click on the picture below !
Please send your comments, questions or suggestions to: email@example.com
As Joe Friday from "Dragnet" would say ....."Just the Facts Ma'am"